Bryan Johnson Eyes Exit from Blueprint to Focus on His New Religion

Confident man representing the Bryan Johnson Blueprint antiaging company

Is Bryan Johnson Ready to Step Back from Blueprint?

At 47, Bryan Johnson has become a prominent figure in the longevity scene, not just through his anti-aging startup, Blueprint, but also by recently developing a religion centered around the concept of avoiding death. However, Johnson is now contemplating whether he wants to continue running this company, labeling it a "pain-in-the-ass" and hinting at either shutting it down or selling it to focus his efforts on his new religious endeavors.

Why the Shift in Focus?

In a candid interview with Wired, Johnson expressed concerns that running a business dedicated to longevity might not align well with his new religious pursuits. He mentioned how he started Blueprint initially out of a desire to share health products with friends. As the business grew, however, he felt that it undermined his credibility as a spiritual leader. "I will not make that trade-off. It is not worth it to me," he stated, reflecting on the difficulties of balancing the dual roles of entrepreneur and preacher.

Plans for the Future

Despite the earlier statements about wanting to step back, Johnson quickly clarified via social media that he actually sees a vital need for Blueprint and plans to integrate it with his religious philosophy, asserting that his projects are essentially the same mission. Johnson is in the process of hiring a new CEO and CTO to handle daily operations, allowing him to concentrate more on his overarching goal: the survival of humanity amidst technological advances.

Conclusion: The Intersection of Business and Belief

As Johnson navigates the complex interplay between business and personal philosophy, his journey raises questions about motivation, purpose, and the balance between financial success and deeper existential inquiries. Should you find yourself inspired by Johnson's quest for longevity or intrigued by his new religious movement, it’s crucial to consider how these narratives not only shape businesses but also influence societal health and well-being.

TAX HELP

0 Views

0 Comments

Write A Comment

Related Posts All Posts

07.23.2025

How the OBBBA Expensing Reform Can Transform State Tax Policies

Update Enhancing Corporate Tax Structures with OBBBAThe One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) promises to reshape state tax codes dramatically by introducing provisions for business expensing that states would be wise to adopt. As economic pressures tighten, understanding these tax policies is crucial for financial stability and growth.Understanding the Importance of Full ExpensingUnder the new legislation, businesses can immediately deduct the full cost of certain investments, eliminating the outdated practice of lengthy depreciation schedules. This change encourages timely investment in technology and infrastructure, which are vital for enhancing productivity and job creation across the economy. Especially in a climate where many states face revenue challenges, this shift towards full expensing can bolster local economies by incentivizing businesses to expand and innovate more freely.Consequences of Not Adopting OBBBA ProvisionsIf states choose not to conform to the OBBBA’s business expensing provisions, they risk falling behind economically. Without these stimulative tax policies, regions may struggle with declining business investments and wages. Conversely, states that embrace these changes can differentiate themselves as favorable environments for business growth, attracting new companies and retaining existing ones.Building a Robust Future for Small BusinessesThe OBBBA specifically raises the cap on the § 179 expensing deduction, significantly benefiting small to medium business owners. With the deduction limit increased from $1 million to $2.5 million, small businesses will have greater flexibility and financial support for capital investments. This increase can lead to enhanced operational efficiency and competitiveness, a boon for local economies.Final Insights on The OBBBAAs everyone from taxpayers aged 25 to 65 to small business owners navigates the changing financial landscape, understanding tax reforms like those introduced by the OBBBA is essential. These measures, if adopted by the states, could lead to better outcomes for economic growth, ultimately benefiting the entire community.

07.22.2025

Trump's $10 Billion Libel Lawsuit Against Murdoch: What Taxpayers Need to Know

Update Trump Takes Legal Action Against Murdoch In an escalating legal battle, President Donald Trump has filed a $10 billion libel lawsuit against media giant Rupert Murdoch. This comes after a controversial Wall Street Journal article linked Trump to the notorious sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Crucially, the case will be overseen by Judge Darrin Gayles, the same federal judge who previously handled a breach-of-contract lawsuit that Trump dropped against his former lawyer, Michael Cohen. Implications of Judge Gayles on the Case Judge Gayles, notable for being the first openly gay Black man on the federal bench, has been a pivotal figure in Trump's legal history. Trump withdrew his $500 million lawsuit against Cohen shortly after Judge Gayles scheduled Trump's deposition, indicating how crucial Gayles' role may be in the current libel suit. Trump now faces the decision of whether to again confront questions under oath pertaining to his long-standing friendship with Epstein and his controversial remarks about him. The High Stakes of Trump's Legal Entanglements This latest lawsuit is significant for taxpayers, as any damages awarded could ultimately come from public funds. Furthermore, the implications of Trump's statements about Epstein, including comments about enjoying the company of younger women, might attract both media attention and public scrutiny. A trial would not only raise questions about Trump's past but could also lead to broader discussions about accountability among public figures. What This Means for Taxpayers As American taxpayers, understanding the implications of these lawsuits is essential. The financial and political ramifications could influence tax revenues and public policy in the future. It's important to keep informed about how individual actions by public figures can intersect with taxpayer interests. As we witness this unfolding legal saga, it's crucial to stay aware of how high-profile cases might affect taxpayer priorities and resources in the future. Following these developments could prove enlightening as we consider our own tax planning.

07.22.2025

Why Major Retailers Are Moving Away from Price Matching, Starting with Target

Update Target's Price-Matching Policy Ends: What This Means for Shoppers In a significant shift in retail strategy, Target has announced it will discontinue its price-matching policy as of July 28. Previously, the retailer committed to matching the lowest prices of competitors, a practice that set it apart in the competitive landscape of retail. This decision aligns Target more closely with major players like Walmart, Costco, and Amazon, who have also opted not to engage in price matching. Why Target Made This Change According to retail analyst Neil Saunders, the move is a strategy to enhance financial discipline and protect profits as costs rise due to tariffs. With the looming holiday season approaching—a time marked by fierce price competition—Target aims to more flexibly set its prices. “Perhaps Target was being too generous with its price-matching policy,” Saunders reflected, indicating that while the shift may strengthen Target's pricing strategy, it could also alienate cost-conscious shoppers. Current Retailers That Still Offer Price Matching Even as Target relinquishes this competitive edge, several retailers continue to honor some form of price matching. Best Buy, for example, matches prices from select competitors, including online giants and local stores. Dick's Sporting Goods also has an extensive policy that includes online pricing from major sports brands such as Nike and Under Armour. Similarly, Home Depot and Lowe's match prices from local competitors, but due to the diversity of brands stocked at each store, finding a precise match can be challenging. Implications for Consumers For customers, the lack of a price-matching policy might compel them to shop around more actively for the best deals, especially in a price-sensitive economy. Retail experts suggest that traditional price-matching practices may now be more common among mid-tier brands, further signaling shifts in consumer shopping habits. Looking Ahead: Retail Trends As retailers continue adapting to a rapidly changing market landscape, understanding these evolving strategies becomes essential for consumers looking to maximize their savings. The future of retail could hinge on how well companies balance their pricing strategies with customer expectations, particularly as the holiday shopping season approaches.

Bryan Johnson Eyes Exit from Blueprint to Focus on His New Religion

Is Bryan Johnson Ready to Step Back from Blueprint?

Why the Shift in Focus?

Plans for the Future

Conclusion: The Intersection of Business and Belief

Terms of Service

Privacy Policy

Core Modal Title